INVESTIGATING ISLAM

The Conspiracy of Islam

Why Islam Cannot Stand on Evidence

When Every Thread Unravels, the Whole Fabric Collapses

Islam boldly claims to be the final, perfect revelation from an omniscient God — preserved without error, delivered by a morally impeccable prophet, and providing a universal law that transcends time and culture. It’s a triple crown of impossible claims: infallibility, immortality, and universality — all rolled into one holy package.

Sounds impressive, right? Except when you actually test these claims — and that’s exactly what real critical scrutiny demands.

This isn’t some feel-good faith narrative or a warmed-over “both sides” academic fluff piece. This is a full forensic audit of Islam’s foundational pillars, using Islam’s own texts, early historical sources, and independent archaeological data. And spoiler alert: the results are a dumpster fire of contradictions, lost texts, historical black holes, political expediency, and blatant fabrications.

The Cracked Foundation: The Qur’an’s Preservation Myth

Islamic propaganda shouts from every minaret that the Qur’an is “perfectly preserved” — an unaltered miracle of divine protection. The key verses are trotted out like sacred talismans:

“Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.” (Q 15:9)
“None can change His words.” (Q 6:115)

Except, well, if you bother to read the earliest hadith collections — you’ll find the inconvenient truth: some verses were lost, forgotten, or destroyed. The infamous “stoning verse” for adultery? It was recited during Muhammad’s lifetime, then disappeared soon after his death, admitted by none other than Sahih Muslim itself. The big “oops” moment for preservation claims.

And it gets better. Early Muslim historians like Al-Suyuti openly recorded confessions of forgotten verses. So, either Allah can’t keep His promise or the hadith narrators are outright lying.

Apologetic dodge alert: “Those were not Qur’anic verses, but Sunnah rulings.”
Nice try — but the early Muslim sources explicitly call them ayat (verses) of revelation. You can’t just reclassify inconvenient texts after the fact to save face.

Variant Qur’ans: The Burning of Books Was Politics, Not Divine Mandate

Contrary to the pious tale of a single, flawless Qur’an, historical evidence shows at least 26 different Qur’anic versions existed with meaningful textual differences. Before Caliph Uthman’s “standardization,” companions had personal codices — some missing entire chapters, others with extra material.

Uthman’s solution? Burn all the “incorrect” Qur’ans and force uniformity. A political power play, not a divine miracle.

Apologist’s favorite spin: “All qira’at are divinely revealed and equally valid.”
Yet Uthman ordered the burning of variant copies — which wouldn’t make sense if every version was perfect. And today’s Muslims overwhelmingly use the Hafs version, ignoring many others. Conveniently selective divine perfection.

Abrogation: The Almighty God Who Forgets and Changes His Mind

Islamic theology tries to have it both ways: the Qur’an is eternal and unchanging — except when it changes, because, well, abrogation is part of God’s grand plan. Qur’an 2:106 proudly declares:

“We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth one better or similar.”

Congratulations, you’ve just admitted the “perfect” eternal word of God is subject to upgrades, second thoughts, and human-like trial and error. The omniscient Creator who allegedly crafted the universe can’t get His own law right the first time. Divine infallibility? More like divine flip-flopping.

Missing Verses and Creation Confusion: The Divine Drafts Never Saved

The Qur’an’s preservation claims are further shredded by the admission that some verses vanished entirely — remembered only in oral tradition or scattered hadith. This isn’t accidental loss; it’s built into the narrative.

Meanwhile, the Qur’an itself can’t keep its creation stories straight: six days here, eight days there, earth before heavens, then heavens before earth. An all-knowing God would never publish conflicting cosmic timelines in His final revelation. That’s basic editorial competence.

Contradictions Within the Book: Noah’s Ark and the Torah-Gospel Mess

One chapter says Noah saved his whole family; another insists his son drowned. Which is it? The Qur’an can’t even get a headline biblical story consistent.

As for the Torah and Gospel, the Qur’an endorses them as divine and uncorrupted — until Islamic doctrine turns around and screams “tahrif” (corruption) at Jews and Christians. Pick a lane: either the Qur’an is lying or the later tafsir are.

Science According to 7th-Century Arabia

Islamic apologists love to claim the Qur’an contains scientific miracles. Reality check: its embryology is ripped straight from 2nd-century Greek medical theories, like those of Galen, and its cosmology is proudly geocentric, with the sun “running” to a resting place.

If the Qur’an truly came from an omniscient Creator, why does it echo the scientific errors of the era it was written in? Because it wasn’t divine — it was human, flawed, and historically situated.

History and Archaeology: The Great Silence

Mecca — the supposed cradle of Islam — shows zero archaeological evidence as a major trade or religious center before Islam. Not a single scrap, no inscriptions, no ruins, nothing.

Early mosques’ qibla points not to Mecca but to Petra. That inconvenient fact is politely ignored by mainstream Islamic scholarship, but serious historians cannot.

Battles like Badr and Uhud, and key early Islamic events, have no physical evidence. Meanwhile, the earliest biographies of Muhammad were penned 150 years after his death — long after political agendas shaped the narrative.

Prophethood Under Question: The Satanic Verse Scandal and Flip-Flopping Laws

Early Islamic sources admit Muhammad once recited verses inspired by Satan and later retracted them — an embarrassing scandal that blows apart claims of prophetic infallibility.

Alcohol laws shift from permissive to strictly prohibited, reflecting the kind of trial-and-error policy you’d expect from a mortal legislator, not a divine command.

Hadith, Islam’s second holy text, is riddled with fabrications, contradictions, and forgeries — including in “authentic” collections like Sahih Bukhari.

The Political Construction of Islam

The Kaaba was originally a pagan shrine. Uthman’s burning of variant Qur’ans was a political act to consolidate power.

Oral transmission is notoriously unreliable, yet Islam claims perfect preservation through it.

The Ultimate Collapse

When you put it all together:

Textual inconsistency and loss.
Contradictory doctrine.
Historical silence and political manipulation.
The prophet’s questionable biography.

You don’t have a divine revelation. You have a politically constructed, historically unsubstantiated, theologically incoherent belief system that survives on faith and dogma — not evidence.

The Final Choice: Faith or Facts

Islam’s defenders try to dismiss these glaring flaws as metaphor, weak reports, or irrelevant details. But when every foundational element collapses under scrutiny, it’s not a cracked brick you patch — it’s a crumbling foundation you abandon.

Accept Islam on blind faith — or reject it based on overwhelming, unavoidable evidence.

The choice is yours.