The Problem: Islam Destroys Its Own Revelation Chain
Here is the fatal contradiction:
-
Islam teaches that Allah revealed four scriptures: Torah, Zabur, Injil, and Quran.
-
It also claims that three out of those four (75%) were corrupted.
-
Yet the Quran builds upon, affirms, and validates these very texts.
This creates an inescapable logical dilemma:
If the earlier Islamic scriptures were corrupted, then the Quran is built on a corrupted foundation — and cannot be trusted as an extension or correction of that foundation.
Worse yet, the Quran commands Jews and Christians to judge by their books (Surah 5:43–47), which would be an instruction to follow corrupted revelation — directly contradicting Islam's claim that Allah’s word is unchangeable (Surah 6:115, 18:27).
1. Islam Affirms What It Later Rejects
The Quran explicitly affirms the Torah, Zabur, and Injil as divine revelations:
-
Surah 3:3 – “[Allah] revealed the Torah and the Gospel.”
-
Surah 5:44 – “Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which was guidance and light.”
-
Surah 5:46 – “We gave him [Jesus] the Gospel… as guidance and light.”
-
Surah 17:55 – Refers to the Zabur revealed to David.
Yet the Quran also claims these scriptures were altered:
-
Surah 2:79 – “Woe to those who write the Book with their own hands…”
-
Surah 5:13–15 – “They distorted words from their usages… they forgot a portion…”
So which is it?
-
If they were Allah’s Word, they can’t be corrupted.
-
If they were corrupted, they cannot be affirmed.
🔥 This is not just a problem — it’s a theological implosion.
2. All the Scriptures Are Islamic — and Most Are Corrupted
Most Muslims mistakenly think that only the Quran is “Islamic scripture.” But as shown, all four books are Islamic by definition in Islam. All were:
-
Sent by Allah,
-
To prophets described as Muslims,
-
Part of one unfolding message.
Yet Islam claims that:
-
The Torah was corrupted by Jews,
-
The Injil was corrupted by Christians,
-
The Zabur is virtually ignored or lost.
That means:
Islam admits that three out of four Islamic books have been corrupted.
If Allah’s own previous words could be changed, what logical basis is there to trust the Quran’s claim of preservation?
3. The Quran Builds on What It Condemns
The Quran constantly references the earlier scriptures:
-
It says they contain prophecies of Muhammad (Surah 7:157),
-
It uses earlier revelations to validate itself,
-
It frames itself as the continuation and completion of those books.
Yet if those books were corrupted, that means:
-
The Quran is using unreliable, altered sources as a basis,
-
And building its credibility on a foundation it condemns.
🔁 That’s circular reasoning on a broken circle.
4. The Claim of Quranic Preservation Is Meaningless
Muslims claim:
"Yes, the earlier books were corrupted, but the Quran has been preserved."
But that misses the point entirely.
Preserving the final book does nothing if the entire chain leading up to it is admitted to be broken. If the Torah, Zabur, and Injil — all Islamic revelations — were corrupted, then:
-
Allah failed to protect His Word three times,
-
And only succeeded the fourth time.
That’s not divine omnipotence — that’s trial and error.
🔨 The claim of Quranic preservation is logically meaningless when it rests on the admitted failure of previous revelations.
5. Manuscript Evidence Contradicts the Islamic Claim
Historical evidence does not support the idea that the Torah, Zabur, and Injil were corrupted:
-
The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm the preservation of the Torah.
-
The Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus preserve the Gospel with only minor variations.
-
The Psalms (Zabur) have been consistently transmitted.
Islam's claim of widespread corruption is not backed by evidence. It's a theological necessity invented to justify the Quran’s supersession — not a historically demonstrated fact.
6. Final Result: Islam Is Theologically and Logically Defeated
Let’s summarize:
-
The Quran says Allah’s word cannot be changed.
-
It affirms earlier scriptures as divine Islamic revelations.
-
It also says those scriptures were corrupted.
-
It then builds upon and validates those same corrupted texts.
-
It relies on a chain of revelation that it admits is 75% broken.
This isn’t a minor contradiction — this is foundational collapse.
🔚 Final Word
Many Muslims may continue to believe based on tradition, emotion, or cultural loyalty — but belief doesn’t resolve contradiction. Faith can persist in spite of logic, but it cannot erase it.
Islam’s internal contradiction regarding its own scriptures is airtight, undeniable, and fatal.
From a historical, theological, and logical perspective:
✅ Islam is not just flawed — it is theologically self-destructive.
💬 "The moment Islam claimed its own scriptures were corrupted, it destroyed the foundation it was built on."
And that is the inescapable truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment